<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A specialized technique developed specifically for ophthalmic surgery has led surgeons at the Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital to perform most private cataract extractions-more than 1,000 per year-with patients under general anesthsia. Because this practice is followed by so few ophthalmic surgeons elsewhere, an evaluation of the relative safety and benefits of local vs. general anesthesia was undertaken. A retrospective study comparing 2,217 consecutive patients operated on under general anesthesia with 561 patients operated on under local analgesia leads us to believe that general anesthesia providess the surgeon with optimum operating conditions. General anaessthesia has proved to be a safe procedure, with a minimum of complications. The ophthalmic surgeon is assured of absolute patient immobility, with safety equilvalent to that seen with procedures performed with local analgesia, despite the advanced age and resulting physiological degeneration of the patient population.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Cataract, Postoperative Complications, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Female, Analgesia, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Child, Halothane, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Cataract, Postoperative Complications, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Female, Analgesia, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Child, Halothane, Aged
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |