
pmid: 9821834
Programs that train health professionals to identify and treat battered women have not previously incorporated systematically obtained advice from battered women to guide physician behavior.To survey battered women to (1) rate the desirability of specific physician behaviors, (2) describe their actual experiences with physicians while seeking abuse-related medical services, and (3) examine relationships between participants' demographics, history of victimization, history of seeking medical help, and ratings of physician behavior.One hundred fifteen women who had been battered by a male partner, recruited from support groups and other battered women's programs in a 5-county area in southeastern Wisconsin.Self-report survey of demographic information, relationship history, observations of physician behavior, and ratings of desirability for those behaviors. Analysis used cross-tabulations, chi2, and multiple t tests with Bonferonni adjustments for multiple comparisons.Women identified specific physician behaviors as desirable and undesirable. Desirability ratings did not differ with history of victimization, history of seeking medical help, or most other demographic variables. African American and white women rated a few physician behaviors differently.We identified discrete sets of desirable and undesirable physician behaviors. Further research is needed to clarify racial differences found in this study. Findings can help guide both clinical practice and the development of physician training curricula.
Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Battered Women, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Wisconsin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female
Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Battered Women, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Wisconsin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
