
This article is dedicated to problematic experience, that the intellectual property rightholder may face in the sphere of pharmacology and pharmaceutics. It is displayed, what kind of measures are taken by the legal system, judicial system and rightholders in order to minimize the negative outcome caused by these problems. Intellectual property insurance mechanism is being analyzed as one of the effective methods of loss reduction for rightholders.Pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers argue that the current patent system is crucial for stimulating research and development (R&D), leading to new products that improve medical care. The financial return on their investments that is afforded by patent protection, they claim, is an incentive toward innovation and reinvestment into further R&D. But this view has been challenged in recent years. Many commentators argue that patents are stifling biomedical research, for example by preventing researchers from accessing patented materials or methods they need for their studies. Patents have also been blamed for impeding medical care by raising prices of essential medicines, such as antiretroviral drugs, in poor countries. This debate examines whether and how patents are impeding health care and innovation.The question posed in the title of this debate seems to be a simple one, but there is a complex spectrum of answers depending on how one interprets the question. In this article, the author researches different interpretations and their corresponding answers.
В статье определяются проблемы, с которыми может столкнуться правообладатель в сфере фармакологии и фармацевтики. Указывается, какиемеры принимаются законодателем, судебной системой и самими участниками рынка для минимизации негативных последствий, которые могут повлечь исследуемые проблемы. Рассматривается механизм страхования интеллектуальной собственности как экономически эффективное рыночное решение для правообладателей в данной области.
У статті визначаються проблеми, з якими може зіткнутися правоволоділець у сфері фармакології та фармацевтики. Вказується, які заходи вживаються законодавцем, судовою системою і самими учасниками ринку задля мінімізації негативних наслідків, які можуть спричинити проблеми, що досліджуються. Розглядається механізм страхування інтелектуальної власності як економічно ефективне ринкове рішення для правоволодільців у даній галузі.
iintellectual property; insurance; pharmacology; pharmaceutics; generic drug; patents; patent trolls, интеллектуальная собственность; фармакология; фармацевтика; страхование; патентный троллинг, інтелектуальна власність; фармакологія; фармацевтика; страхування; патентний тролінг
iintellectual property; insurance; pharmacology; pharmaceutics; generic drug; patents; patent trolls, интеллектуальная собственность; фармакология; фармацевтика; страхование; патентный троллинг, інтелектуальна власність; фармакологія; фармацевтика; страхування; патентний тролінг
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
