Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Filarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ЛОГИКА СОВРЕМЕННОГО РЕЛИГИОЗНОГО СОЗНАНИЯ

ЛОГИКА СОВРЕМЕННОГО РЕЛИГИОЗНОГО СОЗНАНИЯ

Abstract

The article is a logical reconstruction of the main elements of modern religious consciousness. For this, a form of inference is used that should satisfy the requirement of system analysis.The most important role in this system is played by the phenomenon of secular consciousness. Here he acts as a general mediator (medius terminus). The originality of its ontological status is underlined. Accordingly, here arises the question of opposites (extreme terms), the opposition of which should remove this secular consciousness.To solve this problem, the author turns to the history of world religions. At the«junctions» of these religions, two forces always find themselves, the contradiction between which is the engine of this history. This, first, the strength of the religious tradition (conservative element), and, secondly, the power of religious innovation (a revolutionary element).Contrary to popular belief about the decay of religious life, the author defends the thesis that in a certain sense this confrontation between religious tradition and religious innovation will always exist. As long as a person is alive and thinking, he will be concerned about the question of God. Only in modern times, the struggle between the old and the new in religion has one distinctive feature. In history, it was resolved naturally: old civilizations and cultures, the core of which was a certain religion, died and replaced by new ones. Now the entire responsibility for this withdrawal fell on the shoulders of the modern secular state.Thus, the reasoning of modern religious consciousness has developed completely in itself and for itself. It has acquired the following character: «religious tradition – secular consciousness – religious innovation». Here the author uses the «horizontal» form of inference, which Hegel suggested in his Science of Logic. This form allows not only to structure the basic elements of this system, but also to consider further ways of its development. The latter is especially important in connection with the complex of problems that arise before a secular state in connection with the theory and practice of conducting a religious expert examination.The causes of the emergence of the system of modern religious consciousness are analyzed. It establishes its relationship with the process of historical development of religion and philosophy.

В статье проводится логическая реконструкция основных элементов современ- ного религиозного сознания. Для этого применяется форма умозаключения, которая должна удовлетворить требование системного анализа. Важнейшую роль в данной системе играет феномен светского сознания. Здесь он выступает в роли всеобщего посредника (medius terminus). Подчеркивается оригинальность его онтологического статуса: становления светского государства и практики проведения религиовед- ческой экспертизы. Анализируются причины возникновения этого сознания и уста- навливается его взаимосвязь с процессом исторического развития религии и фило- софии. 

У статті проводиться логічна реконструкція основних елементів сучасної релігійної свідомості. Для цього застосовується форма умовиводу, яка повинна задовольнити вимогу системного аналізу. Найважливішу роль у даній системі відіграє феномен світської свідомості. Тут він виступає в ролі загального по- середника (medius terminus). Підкреслюється оригінальність його онтологічного статусу: становлення світської держави і практики проведення релігієзнавчої експертизи. Аналізуються причини виникнення цієї свідомості і встановлюєть- ся його взаємозв’язок з процесом історичного розвитку релігії і філософії. 

Keywords

религия; сознание; умозаключение; философия; религиоведческая экспертиза, релігія; свідомість; умовивід; філософія; релігієзнавча екс- пертиза, 298.9(045.2), religion; consciousness; reasoning; philosophy; excess; Religious expertise

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold