Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Teaching suturing in a workshop setting: a comparison of several models.

Authors: Tokuhara, Keith G; Boldt, David W; Yamamoto, Loren;

Teaching suturing in a workshop setting: a comparison of several models.

Abstract

Suturing is taught in workshops using a variety of models. The purpose of this study is to compare the resemblance to human skin of four models commonly used to teach suturing: pig skin, beef tongue, hot dog and latex glove.5 centimeter biconvex incisions were made in each of the models and closed by 50 physician study volunteers comprised of 33 board-certified physicians and 17 resident physicians. They rated each model on a scale of 1 to 4, where 4 closely resembles human skin and 1 does not resemble human skin.The following mean ratings were given by study volunteers: beef tongue 3.5 +/- 0.5, pig skin 3.2 +/- 0.8, latex glove 1.6 +/- 0.7, hot dog 1.4 +/- 0.6.Beef tongue and pig skin were rated highest by study volunteers. However, pig skin is much cheaper than beef tongue. Pig skin is the best inexpensive model for teaching skin suturing of the four models studied.

Keywords

Medical/methods, Competency-Based Education/methods, Education, Medical, Animal, Suture Techniques/education, Swine, Teaching, Suture Techniques, Competency-Based Education, Education, Models, Models, Animal, Animals, Cattle

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!