Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Retinal Detachments after Open-Globe Injury: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Authors: Alina K, Sinha; Asad F, Durrani; Katie X, Li; Yunshu, Zhou; David C, Musch; David N, Zacks; Michael J, Huvard;

Retinal Detachments after Open-Globe Injury: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Abstract

To identify risk factors for retinal detachment (RD) after open-globe injury (OGI) and evaluate outcomes of RD repair after OGI.Case-control study.Overall, 769 patients presented with 786 OGIs, which were surgically managed with ≥ 30 days of follow-up. Of the 786 eyes, 223 developed RD, the other 551 served as controls, and RD status of 12 eyes was unknown.A retrospective chart review was performed of all OGIs presented to the University of Michigan between 2000 and 2022. Multivariable regression identified risk factors for RD after OGI and predictors of poor vision after RD repair. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated time from OGI to RD.Predictors of visual outcome after RD repair after OGI.After OGI, 223 (28.4%) of 786 eyes were diagnosed with RD, with > 73% diagnosed within a month. Predictors of RD include posterior injury (zone II vs. I odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.04-2.46]; P = 0.0331; zone III vs. I OR, 2.29 [1.53-3.41]; P < 0.0001), vitreous hemorrhage (OR, 2.29 [1.54-3.1]; P < 0.0001), and presenting acuity worse than count fingers (CFs) (OR, 2.65 [1.69 - 4.16]; P < 0.0001). Retinal detachment repair took place in 142 of 223 eyes. The mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) improved from 2.3 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.9 after RD repair at 6-month follow-up, with 51.2% of eyes achieving CF or better vision. Single surgery anatomic success rate was 69.7% and final anatomic success was 88%. Predictors of vision worse than CF include history of ocular surgery (OR, 0.32 [0.11-0.94]; P = 0.039), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR; OR, 0.39 [0.16 - 0.92]; P = 0.032), aphakia (OR, 0.25 [0.08 - 0.77]; P = 0.016), and redetachment (OR, 0.26 [0.1 - 0.63]; P = 0.003).Most RD occur within the first month after OGI. Patients with posterior injuries, vitreous hemorrhage, or poor presenting VA were more likely to develop RD after OGI. Anatomic success was achieved in the majority, as was final VA of CF vision or better. History of ocular surgery, PVR at time of repair, aphakia, and redetachment were risk factors for a poor outcome.The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Keywords

Eye Injuries, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative, Retinal Detachment, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Vitreous Hemorrhage, Aphakia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!