Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Discharge from hospital: left in limbo].

Authors: Annette J, Berendsen;

[Discharge from hospital: left in limbo].

Abstract

An article pertaining to a large European qualitative study into the discharge of patients from hospital was published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine (Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde). Earlier qualitative and quantitative research in the Netherlands had resulted in the same findings: patients wish to receive more information upon discharge. Improvements have been realised, but not at every hospital or department. There is considerable variation as to how much information is desired by individual patients. Healthcare providers should take these differences into account and provide personalised information. For some patients, too much information increases their anxiety. We agree with the recommendations of the authors of the article. It is very important that nurses and doctors communicate with patients who are to be discharged. The elderly and patients who live alone need extra attention. GPs and specialists should discuss amongst themselves how to best compose a format for the specialist's report, including what type of information the GPs need to inform their patients adequately. As performance indicators, the telephone accessibility of GPs and the time it takes to receive the specialist's report could be considered as options.

Keywords

Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Safety Management, General Practitioners, Medical Staff, Hospital, Humans, Family, Female, Continuity of Patient Care, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Discharge

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!