Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HRČAK - Portal of Cr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Prozodemske varijante u antroponimiji

PROSODIC VARIANTS IN ANTHROPONYMY
Authors: Bjelanović, Živko;

Prozodemske varijante u antroponimiji

Abstract

In shaping the semantic side of anthroponyms, accent and quantity are not merely concomitant elements to the word-forming morpheme. Just as a meliorative or a pejorative can be derived through the use of a suffix with positive connotation or one with negative connotation, so also one or another prosodeme can give opposing semantic values to anthroponymic lexemes. The article cites examples like Dȕjica, Đȍkica, Đȕrica, Jȁndrica, Jȍvica as hypocoristics and Dújica, Đókica, Đúrica, Jándrica, Jóvica as pejoratives. Likewise the anthroponymic minimal pairs of feminine names Đȕkica/Đúkica, Jȁgica/Jágica and Jèkĩna/Jèkina, Màndĩna/Màndina etc. have opposite meanings

U forrniranju semantičkog plana antroponima akcent i kvantiteta nisu tek pratioci izvođenja tvorbenim elementorn. Onako kao što meliorativ ili pejorativ nastaje u derivaciji zavisno od sufiksa pozitivne ili sufiksa negativne konotacije, tako se i prozodemom ove ili one prirode mogu dobiti opozitne semantičke vrijednosti antroponimskih leksema. U članku su prikazani primjeri tipa Dȕjica, Đȍkica, Đȕrica, Jȁndrica, Jȍvica, kao hipokoristici i tipa Đújica, Đókica, Đúrica, Jándrica, Jóvica kao pejorativi. Na sličan način opozitno značenje imaju i antroponimske varijante ženskog roda Đȕkica/Đúkica, Jȁgica/Jágica te Jèkĩna/Jèkina, Màndĩna/Màndina itd.

Country
Croatia
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze