Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Метафорическое пространство эмоций в русском языке: структура и когнитивные стратегии моделирования

Authors: Babenko, L. G.; Romanova, M. A.;

Метафорическое пространство эмоций в русском языке: структура и когнитивные стратегии моделирования

Abstract

This article focuses on the analysis of the structure of the metaphorical space of emotions, modeled through a paradigmatic analysis of emotive vocabulary. The primary source of material is the thesaurus “Alphabet of Emotions” (2021). A total of 2,091 lexemes with metaphorical meanings representing 19 fundamental emotive concepts were analyzed. The statistical analysis of the sample yielded data on the proportion of metaphorical meanings within grammatical, functional-semantic, and denotative-ideographic classes of emotive vocabulary. It was established that the processes of enriching the emotive vocabulary with metaphorical meanings are most active within the functional-semantic classes related to emotional impact and the formation of emotional states. A set of denotative-ideographic groups of emotive vocabulary with high, medium, and low content of metaphorical language was identified. The categorization of emotive metaphors by source domains of metaphorical transfer was carried out using a meta-language of semantic descriptors. Within the structure of the metaphorical space, 193 metaphorical models were identified, grouped into 23 denotative spheres. A model of the metaphorical space of emotions is proposed in a field format. The core of the metaphorical space of emotions is formed by vocabulary related to specific physical activities. The peripheral zone includes vocabulary from the domains of “Living Nature,” “Inanimate Nature,” “Perception,” and “Human as a Living Being.”

Статья посвящена анализу структуры метафорического пространства эмоций, смоделированной на основе парадигмального анализа эмотивной лексики. Источником материала выступил словарь-тезаурус «Алфавит эмоций» (2021). Проанализирована 2091 лексема с метафорическим значением, репрезентирующая 19 базовых эмотивных концептов. В результате статистического анализа выборки были получены данные о доле метафорических значений в грамматических, функционально-семантических и денотативно-идеографических классах эмотивной лексики. Установлено, что наиболее активно процессы пополнения состава эмотивной лексики метафорическими значениями протекают в функционально-семантических классах лексики эмоционального воздействия и становления эмоционального состояния. Выявлен набор денотативно-идеографических групп эмотивной лексики с повышенным, средним и низким содержанием метафорической лексики. Осуществлена категоризация эмотивных метафор по областям-источникам метафорического переноса с использованием метаязыка семантических дескрипторов. В структуре метафорического пространства выявлены 193 метафорические модели, объединенные в 23 денотативные сферы. Предлагается модель метафорического пространства эмоций в формате поля. Ядро метафорического пространства эмоций формирует лексика конкретной физической деятельности. В приядерную зону входит лексика сфер «Живая природа», «Неживая природа», «Восприятие», «Человек как живое существо».

Статья поступила в редакцию 02.10.2024, одобрена после рецензирования 23.11.2024, подготовлена к публикации 30.06.2025.

The article was submitted 02.10.2024; approved after reviewing 23.11.2024; accepted for publication 30.06.2025.

Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда, проект № 22-18-00352.

The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 22-18-00352.

Keywords

МЕТАФОРИЧЕСКОЕ ПРОСТРАНСТВО, METAPHORICAL SPACE, EMOTIVE SEMANTICS, МЕТАФОРИЗАЦИЯ ЭМОЦИЙ, ЭМОТИВНАЯ СЕМАНТИКА, METAPHORIZATION OF EMOTIONS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!