Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Orviumarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Orvium
Article
Data sources: Orvium
Claim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Retractions, retracted articles and withdrawals coverage in scholarly databases

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article
Authors: José Luis Ortega; Lorena Joaquina Delgado Quirós;

Retractions, retracted articles and withdrawals coverage in scholarly databases

Abstract

This paper analyses the coverage of retractions, retracted publications and withdrawals by seven scholarly databases (Dimensions, The Lens, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus and Web of Science). The results show that there are two types of products: traditional citation indexes (WoS, PubMed, Scopus) based in the selection of journals and where withdrawals are not indexed; and new hybrid databases (Dimensions, OpenAlex, Scilit and The Lens), less selective and based in external sources such as Crossref and Microsoft Academic. These differences are mainly due to the coverage of withdrawals.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback