Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Digital library (rep...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Партийная динамика российских регионов по итогам парламентских выборов 2019-2020 годов

Партийная динамика российских регионов по итогам парламентских выборов 2019-2020 годов

Abstract

Статья посвящена анализу выборов в законодательные собрания российских регионов в 2019–2020 гг. и воздействию результатов этих выборов на состояние региональных партийных систем. На основе количественного анализа показаны нарастание конку-ренции в партийных системах регионов и неравномерный характер этих изменений. The elections to the legislative assemblies of the Russian regions, held in 2019–2020, did not become a turning point in the development of the Russian political system. However, the results of these elections demonstrate a well-defined vector in the dynamics of regional party systems. The data of the study strongly indicate that in the regions of Russia there is a gradual increase in the level of political pluralism. Despite changes in electoral legislation and the efforts of the regional authorities, the effectiveness of participation in the elections of the parliamentary opposition and non-parliamentary parties is growing. Although the number of parties that put forward lists in regional elections is decreasing, and election commissions register not all party lists, the share of votes that go to the opposition is increasing. Reducing the activity of some parties and not allowing others to participate in the election campaign no longer guarantees the victory of the “party of power’. In the context of the growing protest activity, the reduction in the number of election participants is one of the factors in the consolidation of the opposition increasing its effectiveness. Therefore, the factional composition of the legislative assemblies of the regions, which are less and less similar to the four-party State Duma, is expanding. So far, the effect of the “fabricated majority” still allows United Russia to maintain leadership in almost all regional parliaments. However, the increase in the effective number of electoral and parliamentary parties in practice in all regions over the past years convincingly confirms the tendency to increase the level of inter-party competition. The index of the average effective number of parties developed by the author allows comparing between regions and relatively accurately determining the place of each of them in the overall rating. Although most of the regions where legislative elections were held in 2019–2020 are difficult to classify as competitive, the value of the index of the effective number of parties has increased even in them. Moreover, a number of regions, following the results of these elections, showed a noticeable increase and a high level of the value of this index by Russian standards. All this suggests that the diversity of regional party systems in Russia is growing, and this trend requires the attention of researchers.

Country
Russian Federation
Related Organizations
Keywords

регионы, Россия, эффективное число партий, выборы, политическая конкуренция, партийные системы

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities