
Рассмотрены алгоритмы фильтрации медицинских изображений для устранения аддитивного, импульсного и комбинированного шумов. На основе полученных количественных оценок качества изображений, визуальной оценки, а также профилей изображений проведено сравнение алгоритмов фильтрации. Представлены таблицы пиковых отношений сигнал/шум и времени работы программ для определения лучшего алгоритма. Получены рекомендации по выбору фильтров с учётом эффективности и времени их работы Algorithms filtering of medical images to eliminate additive, pulse and combined noise were considered. Algorithms of filtering were compared based on received quantitative estimates of image quality, visual evaluation and image's profiles. Tables of peak signal/noise ratio and the time of algorithms executing were represented. The recommendations for the selection of filters based on effectiveness and timing of their work were proposed
algorithms of filtration medical images, comparison of algorithms of filtration, peak signal, алгоритмы фильтрации, noise ratio, фильтрация медицинских изображений, пиковое отношение сигнал/шум
algorithms of filtration medical images, comparison of algorithms of filtration, peak signal, алгоритмы фильтрации, noise ratio, фильтрация медицинских изображений, пиковое отношение сигнал/шум
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
