Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Electronic National ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Определение места и роли акторов в экономической науке и в экономической системе общества

Определение места и роли акторов в экономической науке и в экономической системе общества

Abstract

В статье проанализированы результаты и формы междисциплинарной интеграции в обществознании (экономической теории, социологии, философии, права). Обоснован вывод о том, что междисциплинарная интеграция социальных дисциплин не только стимулирует развитие экономической науки, но и существенно изменяет сам характер этого развития, выводя экономическую науку за рамки узко экономической проблематики на уровень решения общесоциологических проблем. Охарактеризованы особенности и направления развития современной экономической науки и сделан вывод о приоритетности экономических исследований в русле новой институциональной экономики (НИЭ). Проанализировано содержание понятий, используемых в экономической науке для характеристики участников социально-экономических процессов: «субъекты», «агенты», «акторы». Выдвинуто и аргументировано положение о том, что наиболее адекватным не только для НИЭ, но и для экономической науки в целом является использование понятия «актор», которое наиболее адекватно отражает место и роль человека в экономической системе общества. The article analyzes the results and forms of interdisciplinary integration in the social science (economics, sociology, philosophy and law). The conclusion that the interdisciplinary integration of social disciplines not only stimulates the development of economic science, but also significantly changes the very nature of this development by leading economic science beyond narrow economic concerns to the level of solving the general sociological problems, has been substantiated. Specific features and directions of development of modern economic science have been described, it has been concluded about priority of the economic research, in line with the new institutional economics (NIE). Content of the concepts, used in economic science to characterize socio-economic processes, namely: «entities», «agents», «actors» has been analyzed. A proposition has been erected and reasoned that most appropriate not only for NIE, but also for economic science in general, is the use of the concept of «actor», which most adequately reflects the place and role of human in the economic system of society.

Related Organizations
Keywords

interdisciplinary integration, науки социальные, economic entities, новая институциональная экономика, интеграция междисциплинарная, economic agents, social sciences, new institutional economics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green