Антропологическая программа правоприменения
Copyright policy )Антропологическая программа правоприменения
The article deals with the limitations of a dogmatic approach to enforcement. The author offers a new approach to enforcement. This approach focuses on the analysis of the motivation of law enforcement authority. The author shows the importance of studying framework in the implementation process and formulates the dialogical nature of law enforcement, demonstrating prospects of the methodology of discourse analysis.
Автор статьи обосновывает ограниченность догматического подхода к правоприменению и предлагает новый, базирующийся на анализе мотивации правоприменителя. Отмечается важность изучения типизаций и фреймов в процессе правоприменения, формулируется диалогическая природа правоприменения, демонстрируются перспективы методологии дискурс-анализа.
ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЕ,СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ ПРАВА,ДИАЛОГ,ДИСКУРС-АНАЛИЗ,LAW ENFORCEMENT,SOCIO-CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF LAW,DIALOGUE,DISCOURSE-ANALYSIS
ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЕ,СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ ПРАВА,ДИАЛОГ,ДИСКУРС-АНАЛИЗ,LAW ENFORCEMENT,SOCIO-CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF LAW,DIALOGUE,DISCOURSE-ANALYSIS
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!