Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Teoriâ i Praktika Ob...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

О некоторых проблемах квалификации мошенничества в сфере компьютерной информации

О некоторых проблемах квалификации мошенничества в сфере компьютерной информации

Abstract

In the contemporary society the computer information in its various manifestations is actively used for civilian traffic, and therefore, is increasingly becoming a target of criminal attacks. The article analyzes the regulation, recently included in the Criminal Code, which envisages criminal liability for fraud in the field of computer information. The authors dispute the correctness of the chosen conceptual approach of the legislator to consider the fraud only in some certain areas of the public activity. The introduction of the criminal legal regulation, specified in the article 159.6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, seems to be questionable, as well as the correctness of its content. The authors show the lack of consistency in the article 159.6 of the Criminal Code, state its weak points and ways to improve them.

Компьютерная информация в различных ее проявлениях в современном обществе активно используется для обеспечения гражданского оборота и именно поэтому все чаще становится объектом преступных посягательств. В данной статье авторы анализируют недавно включенную в УК РФ норму, предусматривающая уголовную ответственность за мошенничество в сфере компьютерной информации. Ставится под сомнение правильность избранного концептуального подхода законодателя в выделении мошенничества только в определенных сферах общественной деятельности. Представляется не бесспорной актуальность введения уголовно-правовой нормы, предусмотренной ст. 159.6 УК РФ, а также корректность ее содержания; показывается отсутствие логичности в ее конструировании. Отмечаются ее несовершенство и пути его устранения.

Keywords

УГОЛОВНОЕ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО, КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЕ МОШЕННИЧЕСТВО, КОМПЬЮТЕРНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ, ХИЩЕНИЕ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities