Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://cyberleninka....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Способы чрескожного чреспеченочного и чрездренажного стентирования посттравматических стриктур желчных протоков

Способы чрескожного чреспеченочного и чрездренажного стентирования посттравматических стриктур желчных протоков

Abstract

43 cases of treatment of patients with good-quality strictures of biliary tract from 2006 to 2013 are surveyed in the publication. Stenting by nitinol stents was carried out intradermal or through a removable transhepatic drainage. Most of patients had some (2-4) undergone operations (76,7%) in the anamnesis with formation of high strictures (53,3%). Covered (32,6%) and uncovered (67,4%) stents were used. Various complications at 13 (30,2%) patients are surveyed. Disturbance of permeability of small diameter stents was the main reason for unsatisfactory results. It demanded excision of a stent or carrying out a cholangioscopy and lithotripsy. Excellent and good results were registered at 77% of patients. 12 stents at 10 (23,3%) patients are removed. Efficiency of method is recognized, the good level of life quality is stated.

В публикации рассмотрены 43 случая лечения пациентов с доброкачественными стриктурами желчных путей с 2006 по 2013 год. Стентирование нитеноловыми стентами выполняли чрезкожно или через сменный транспеченочный дренаж. Большинство больных имели в анамнезе несколько (2-4) перенесенных операций (76,7 %), с формированием высоких стриктур (53,3 %). Использовали покрытые (32,6 %) и непокрытые (67,4 %) стенты. Рассмотрены различные осложнения, возникшие у 13-ти (30,2 %) больных. Основной причиной неудовлетворительных результатов было нарушение проходимости стентов малого диаметра. Это потребовало удаления стента либо проведения холангиоскопии и литотрипсии. Отличные и хорошие результаты - у 77 % пациентов. Удалено 12 стентов у 10-ти (23,3 %) больных. Признана эффективность метода, констатирован хороший уровень качества жизни.

Keywords

ПОСТТРАВМАТИЧЕСКИЕ СТРИКТУРЫ, НИТИНОЛОВЫЕ СТЕНТЫ, ЖЕЛЧНЫЕ ПРОТОКИ, МЕХАНИЧЕСКАЯ ЖЕЛТУХА, ХОЛАНГИОСКОПИЯ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities