Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

«Идеополе»: опыт персонологического прочтения (к 80-летию B. C. Мухиной)

«Идеополе»: опыт персонологического прочтения (к 80-летию B. C. Мухиной)

Abstract

The critical analysis of the theoretical conceptions and thesaurus of the author of "The Personality: Myths and Reality" monograph is described. The necessities of understanding how the scientist''s works develop the categorical system of science, how nontrivial are the factors that have been discovered by the scientists, how her conceptions and approaches are transcend the existing science innovating social consciousness are discussed. In her theory, the author shows the verges of psychological reality that are directly contiguous to the verges of social existence. What is at issue are such categories as: the Great Ideofield of social consciousness (or self-consciousness); "personality" as a category is not just the reality, but it is something more than the reality, because it contains something unaccomplished and virtual, personality is not just a myth, but personality is something that rooted into reality. The ideas of V. S. Mukhina''s conception are focused on the realities of life. The idea of phenomenological essence of the archetypes is the personal discovery of the scientist there are a lot of images-archetypes of human characteristics as well as primordial generic words-notions for the archetypes. Ambivalent essence of the Great Ideofield is shown. Metaphorically, the Great Ideofield is the moving universe of the ideas.

Делается анализ теоретических позиций и тезауруса монографии В. С. Мухиной «Личность: Мифы и Реальность...»; обсуждается необходимость понимания того, насколько труды ученого развивают категориальный строй науки, насколько нетривиальны факторы, обнаруженные ученым, в какой мере его концепции и подходы выходят за пределы самой сложившейся науки, производя перемены в самом общественном сознании. В своей теории автор показывает такие грани психологической реальности, которые непосредственно соприкасаются с гранями социального бытия. Речь идет о категориях: Великое идеополе общественного сознания (или самосознания); личность не просто реальность, а нечто большее, так как содержит в себе что-то несостоявшееся, виртуальное; личность не есть только миф, личность нечто, укорененное в реальности. Идеи концепции В. С. Мухиной центрированы на реалиях жизни; идея феноменологической сущности архетипов персональное открытие ученого; образов-архетипов человеческих качеств и их сущностей множество; в качестве архетипов выступают исконные родовые слова-понятия. Показана амбивалентная сущность Великого идеополя. Метафорически Великое идеополе это движущаяся вселенная идей.

Keywords

ВЕЛИКОЕ ИДЕОПОЛЕ ОБЩЕСТВЕННОГО СОЗНАНИЯ (САМОСОЗНАНИЯ),ЛИЧНОСТЬ НЕЧТО БОЛЬШЕЕ,ЧЕМ РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ,ЛИЧНОСТЬ -НЕЧТО УКОРЕНЕННОЕ В РЕАЛЬНОСТИ,ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ СУЩНОСТЬ АРХЕТИПОВ,АРХЕТИПЫ-АНТИОБРАЗЫ,АРХЕТИПЫ-СИНДРОМЫ,ИСКОННЫЕ РОДОВЫЕ СЛОВА-ПОНЯТИЯ В КАЧЕСТВЕ АРХЕТИПОВ,"СВОИ-ЧУЖИЕ","ХОРОШИЙ-ПЛОХОЙ",СТАТУС ОБЪЕКТНОСТИ,АРХЕТИП КАК ОСОБАЯ СУБЪЕКТНОСТЬ,МЕСТОИМЕНИЯ "ОНИ","МЫ","Я" И ДРУГИЕ КАК ОСОБАЯ СУБЪЕКТНОСТЬ И АРХЕТИПЫ,АМБИВАЛЕНТНОСТЬ ВЕЛИКОГО ИДЕОПОЛЯ,ВЕЛИКОЕ ИДЕОПОЛЕ ДВИЖУЩАЯСЯ ВСЕЛЕННАЯ ИДЕЙ,GREAT IDEOFIELD OF SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS (SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS),"PERSONALITY" IS SOMETHING MORE THAN THE REALITY,"PERSONALITY" IS SOMETHING THAT ROOTED IN REALITY,ARCHETYPES-ANTI-IMAGES,ARCHETYPES-SYNDROMES,PRIMORDIAL GENERIC WORDS-NOTIONS FOR THE ARCHETYPES,"OURS-OTHERS","GOOD-BAD",STATUS OF OBJECTIVITY,ARCHETYPE AS A SPECIAL SUBJECTITY,PRONOUNS "THEM","WE","I" ETC. AS A SPECIAL SUBJECTITY AND ARCHETYPES,AMBIVALENCE OF THE GREAT IDEOFIELD,GREAT IDEOFIELD THE MOVING UNIVERSE OF THE IDEAS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average