Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Особенности демографии религиозных общин Индии в начале XXI в

Особенности демографии религиозных общин Индии в начале XXI в

Abstract

The article contains a brief overview of the religious composition of Indian population within the first decade of the twenty-first century. We experienced a known difficulty when obtaining statistics on the religious composition of the Indian public due to its irregular promulgation. Changing disparities in the proportion of the states and union territories' major religions on the basis of 2001 and 2011 National Censuses and 2005-2006 Demographic and Health Survey data are analyzed in detail. At present Hindus constitute the vast majority of the 21 states and 6 union territories' population. The Muslims are in majority in the state of Jammu and Kashmir and in the union territory of Lakshadweep. Traditionally, North-Eastern India has the highest proportion of Christians: they absolutely prevail in the states of Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalaya and form a relative majority in the states of Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur. It is revealed that increase in absolute numbers of Hinduism (an increase of 138.7 million people from 2001 until 2011), Islam (34.1 million), Christianity (3.7 million), Sikhism (1.6 million), Buddhism (0.5 million) and Jainism (0.2 million) adherents was accompanied by an increase in the only Muslim share in total population. Currently in India a natural increase -difference between the numbers of births and deaths makes the largest contribution to the growth of number of the major religions adherents (except perhaps Christianity). It is established that indicators of Muslim, Hindu, Christian and Buddhist fertility are sufficient to save the level of their basic reproduction. It is shown that, at the same time, the growth rate of only Muslim population exceeds the national average level. It is stated that the fall in the proportion of Hindus below the psychologically important mark of 80 % may be an additional factor of destabilization of inter-religious relations in India. That was the reason why the 2011 census data on religious affiliation of India population were published (quite possibly intentionally) only four years after parliamentary elections had been held and the central government had been formed. It is significant that while the proportion of Hindu population to the total population in 2011 had declined, the pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (Indian People's Party) came to power in 2014 and the Indian National Congress, adhered to the secular political tradition, suffered one of the most crushing defeats in its history after it had been in power for ten years.

Дан краткий обзор особенностей трансформации конфессиональной структуры населения Индии за межпереписной период 2001-2011 гг. Детально проанализированы диспропорции в изменении долей представителей крупнейших религий в населении штатов и союзных территорий. Установлено, что для сохранения в краткосрочной перспективе уровня простого воспроизводства населения достаточными являются показатели рождаемости мусульман, индуистов, христиан и буддистов. Показано, что в то же время темпы прироста численности только лишь адептов ислама превышают средний показатель по стране. Это стало причиной сокращения доли представителей всех крупных религий в населении Индии, кроме мусульман. Утверждается, что падение доли индуистов ниже психологически важной отметки в 80% может стать дополнительным фактором дестабилизации межрелигиозных отношений в стране.

Keywords

ИНДИЯ,КОНФЕССИОНАЛЬНАЯ СТРУКТУРА НАСЕЛЕНИЯ,РОЖДАЕМОСТЬ,РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЦИЯ,ВСЕОБЩАЯ ПЕРЕПИСЬ 2011 Г,ВЫБОРОЧНОЕ ОБСЛЕДОВАНИЕ 2005-2006 ГГ,INDIA,RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE OF POPULATION,FERTILITY,REGIONAL DIFFERENCES,2011 POPULATION CENSUS,2005-2006 DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold