
Автор, рассматривая понятие «антропология», приводит несколько критических моментов, которые затрудняют процесс предметного определения антропологии как единой науки о человеке. Это такие затруднения, как фрагментация, объективизм и искусственность. Также в статье представлен анализ наиболее распространенных позиций по проблеме интеграции антропологического знания: ультрадисциплинарных, междисциплинарных, метанаучных.
The author, considering the definition anthropology, gives some critical arguments which makes the process of subjected definition of anthropology as unique science impossible. Such arguments are fragmentation, objectivism and artificiality. Also the article dives the analysis of mostly popular views on the problem of anthropological knowledge integrity: ultra disciplinary, inter disciplinary, meta scientific.
АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАТИВНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАЛЬНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ; ЖИЗНЕННЫЕ ФАКТЫ, ФОРМЫ, УКЛАДЫ, ОБЩНОСТИ, ФЕНОМЕНЫ, ИНСТИНКТЫ, СОБЫТИЯ
АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАТИВНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАЛЬНАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ; ЖИЗНЕННЫЕ ФАКТЫ, ФОРМЫ, УКЛАДЫ, ОБЩНОСТИ, ФЕНОМЕНЫ, ИНСТИНКТЫ, СОБЫТИЯ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
