Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Аксиологические стратегии аргументативного дискурса (Наматериалах политической риторики)

Аксиологические стратегии аргументативного дискурса (Наматериалах политической риторики)

Abstract

The given article is devoted to the determination of content and the description of axiological strategies in argumentative discourse of modern English. The analyzed linguistic means are based on the material of political discourse. Axiological strategies of positive self-presentation and opponents discreditation are pointed out, linguistic means of realization are determined. Attention is given to the manipulative aspect of axiological strategies that is noticed in appellations towards addressees values. The material of the article may be used in teaching of written argumentative speech, discourse analyses, theories of argumentation and speech influence.

Настоящая статья направлена на определение содержания и описание функций аксиологических стратегий аргументативного дискурса современного английского языка, основанных на материалах политической риторики. Выделены основные аксиологические стратегии положительной самопрезентации и «очернения» противника, определены языковые средства их реализации. Уделено внимание манипулятивному аспекту аксиологических стратегий, который обнаруживается в апелляциях к ценностям адресата. Материалы статьи могут быть использованы в обучении письменной речи, спецкурсах по анализу дискурса, теории аргументации и теории речевого воздействия.

Keywords

АКСИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СТРАТЕГИИ, АРГУМЕНТАТИВНЫЙ ДИСКУРС, РЕЧЕВЫЕ АКТЫ, РЕЧЕВОЕ ВОЗДЕЙСТВИЕ, АРГУМЕНТ AD HOMINEM, SPEECH PERSUASION / MANIPULATION

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold