Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Сибирский онкологиче...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Выбор объема лимфодиссекции при субтотальной дистальной резекции желудка

Выбор объема лимфодиссекции при субтотальной дистальной резекции желудка

Abstract

Short-and long-term results of radical surgery for 312 patients with gastric cancer who underwent subtotal distal resection of the stomach depending on the extent of perigastric lymphodissection were analyzed. Increase in the number of the removed lymph nodes up to D2,5 and D3 resulted no in the increase in the rate of postoperative complications. Postoperative complications occurred in 24.6 % of cases after extended lymphodissection and in 27.4 % of cases after the standard lymphodissection. There was a tendency to the improvement of long-term survival rates after D2,5 lymphodissection with the removal of left paracardial lymph nodes as compared to the standard D2 lymphodissection, but significant differences were not noted.

В исследовании проведен анализ непосредственных и отдаленных результатов радикального хирургического лечения 312 больных раком желудка, которым была выполнена субтотальная дистальная резекция желудка, в зависимости от объема перигастральной лимфодиссекции. Увеличение количества удаляемых лимфоузлов до D2,5 и D3 не ведет к росту числа послеоперационных осложнений, при расширенных лимфодиссекциях они возникли в 24,6 %, при стандартных в 27,4 % случаев соответственно. Имеется тенденция к улучшению показателей отдаленной выживаемости после лимфодиссекции в объеме D2,5 с удалением левых паракардиальных лимфатических узлов, которая выше по сравнению со стандартной D2, но достоверных различий не получено.

Keywords

РАК ЖЕЛУДКА, СУБТОТАЛЬНАЯ ДИСТАЛЬНАЯ РЕЗЕКЦИЯ ЖЕЛУДКА, ПЕРИГАСТРАЛЬНАЯ ЛИМФОДИССЕКЦИЯ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research