Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Антоний Печерский и начальная история русского монашества (Рясофор в Древней Руси)

Антоний Печерский и начальная история русского монашества (Рясофор в Древней Руси)

Abstract

According to the Russian Primary Chronicle, when St. Anthony settled in his cave near Kiev, people joined him and he tonsured them as monks. We know, however, that in certain cases he did not tonsure the newcomers but sent them to be tonsured by a priest (hieromonk). Obviously St. Anthony was not a priest. Why, then, in some cases did he do it himself and yet in other cases, he did not? If he was not a priest, how could he tonsure people? The author of the present article attempts to answer these and similar questions with reference to historical, philological, and liturgical data. The article is devoted to the evolution of the monastic tradition in Rus’ of the 11th century.

Повесть временных лет рассказывает о том, как к Антонию, после того как он поселился в пещере близ Киева, стали приходить люди и он постригал их в монахи. Мы знаем, однако, что в некоторых случаях он не постригал приходящих к нему, а отсылал их для пострига к священнику (иеромонаху). Сам Антоний священником, очевидно, не был. Почему в одних случаях он сам совершал монашеский постриг, а в других поручал это священнику? Как он мог постригать в монахи, не будучи священником? Автор настоящей статьи пытается ответить на эти и подобные вопросы, привлекая исторические, филологические и литургические данные. Работа посвящена эволюции монашеской традиции на Руси в ХІ в.

Keywords

Антоний Печерский, Феодосий Печерский, Иларион Киевский, Киево-Печерский монастырь, монашество, рясофор, малая схима, великая схима, Студийский устав

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold