
This article provides a conceptual distinction between the concepts of “existential region” and “subject area”, the value of this distinction for hermeneutic phenomenology being determined. The correlation of “existential region” and «subject area» is clarified on the materials of history (historical things) and is associated with separating regional ontologies from private positive Sciences. Key words: existential region, subject area, regional ontology, hermeneutic phenome-nology, history, Heidegger.
В статье проводится концептуальное разграничение понятий «бытийный регион» и «предметная область», определяется значение этого разграничения для герменевтической феноменологии. Соотношение «бытийного региона» и «предметной области» проясняется на материале истории (исторического сущего) и связывается с разграничением региональных онтологий и частных позитивных наук.
БЫТИЙНЫЙ РЕГИОН, ПРЕДМЕТНАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ, РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ОНТОЛОГИЯ, ГЕРМЕНЕВТИЧЕСКАЯ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЯ, ИСТОРИЯ, ХАЙДЕГГЕР
БЫТИЙНЫЙ РЕГИОН, ПРЕДМЕТНАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ, РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ОНТОЛОГИЯ, ГЕРМЕНЕВТИЧЕСКАЯ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЯ, ИСТОРИЯ, ХАЙДЕГГЕР
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
