Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Vestnik MGIMO-Univer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Таджикистан-Россия: геополитические отношения на рубеже столетий

Таджикистан-Россия: геополитические отношения на рубеже столетий

Abstract

In this article the writer analyses the development peculiarities of the Tajik-Russian geopolitical relations during the establishment of Tajikistan foreign policy up to the commencement of multi-vector «open doors» policy in 2003-2004. Since the establishment of peace and stability in Tajikistan beginning from the year of 2000 the socio-economic development issues have been set as prior actions. To boost the economy, attraction of foreign investments, creation of new jobs and improvement of life standard of population were the issues to address. Political leaders of Tajikistan had no right to waste time making no headway. The country inevitably faced the issue of diversification of interstate and foreign economic relations, including outside the CIS. The article highlights that the foreign «open door» policy declared at the turn of2002-2003 implied mandatory modernization of the Tajik-Russian cooperation through strengthening its economic and human dimensions, adjusting the strategic partnership and alliance between the two states to the new global political realities. As to the geopolitical and military-political priorities, which Tajikistan had firmly adhered throughout the entire 1990th since its Independence, they actually remained unchanged even after 2002. The author points out the long-term Russian presence in the form of a large scale military base and military infrastructure on the territory of Tajikistan. The Republic is one of the most consistent, active and disciplined members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. During the first decade of the XXI century the political leaders of Tajikistan had been receiving offers from foreign non CIS countries with regard to deployment of military facilities on a fee basis on the territory of Tajikistan which were not even considered by the Government. Thus, the multi-vector foreign policy of «open doors» has been reflected in diversification of the international relations of Tajikistan, in demonopolization of trade and economic priorities, in attraction of foreign investments and military-technical assistance from the third countries (other than CIS and CSTO countries) but completely preserving the geopolitical and military-political priorities established until 2002.

Автор анализирует проблему особенностей развития таджикско-российских международных отношений в период становления внешней политики Республики Таджикистан, вплоть до начала реализации многовекторной политики «открытых дверей» в 2003-2004 гг. С наступлением мира и стабильности в Таджикистане, начиная с 2000 г., на первый план вышли вопросы социально-экономического развития. Перед страной неизбежно вставал вопрос диверсификации межгосударственных и внешнеэкономических связей, в том числе вне пределов СНГ. В статье подчёркивается, что объявленная на рубеже 2002-2003 гг. внешняя политика «открытых дверей» предполагала обязательность модернизации таджикско-российского взаимодействия за счёт усиления его экономического и гуманитарного измерений, адаптацию стратегического партнёрства и союзничества двух государств к новым реалиям мировой политической действительности. Что касается геополитических и военно-политических приоритетов Таджикистана, которых он твёрдо придерживался после обретения государственной независимости все 1990-е гг., то они и после 2002 г. практически остались неизменными. Автор отмечает, что на территории Республики Таджикистан сохраняется долгосрочное российское присутствие в виде крупной военной базы и объектов военной инфраструктуры. Таджикистан один из наиболее последовательных, активных и дисциплинированных членов Организации Договора о коллективной безопасности (ОДКБ). В течение первого десятилетия XXI в. в адрес государственного руководства Таджикистана от зарубежных государств (вне СНГ) не раз поступали предложения о размещении на территории страны объектов военной инфраструктуры на платной основе, которые правительством Республики даже не рассматривались. Многовекторный характер внешней политики «открытых дверей» выразился на практике в диверсификации межгосударственных отношений Таджикистана и демонополизации торгово-экономических приоритетов, в привлечении зарубежных инвестиций и военно-технической помощи из третьих по отношению к СНГ и ОДКБ стран при полном сохранении устоявшихся до 2002 г. геополитических и военно-политических приоритетов.

Keywords

ГЕОПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ, ГЕОПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ СИТУАЦИЯ, СТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКИ, МНОГОВЕКТОРАЯ ПОЛИТИКА «ОТКРЫТЫХ ДВЕРЕЙ», ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКИ, МОДЕРНИЗАЦИЯ ТАДЖИКСКО-РОССИЙСКОГО ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ, НЕИЗМЕННОСТЬ ГЕОПОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ ПРИОРИТЕТОВ, АДАПТАЦИЯ СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОГО ПАРТНЁРСТВА, THE «OPEN DOORS» MULTI-VECTOR POLICY

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold