Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Можно ли считать токсическую эритему и слезотечение донозологическими формами гнойно-септических инфекций новорожденных?

Можно ли считать токсическую эритему и слезотечение донозологическими формами гнойно-септических инфекций новорожденных?

Abstract

Bacteriological research of swabs from the skin of 61 newborn children with toxic erythema and conjunctiva discharge of 39 children with lacrimation has been made. 110 healthy children were examined with the purpose of comparison. According to the results of dynamic observation frequency of toxic erythema and lacrimation transition into typical purulo-septic infection were studied. It has been proved that toxic erythema is an independent disease functioning as individual risk factor of newborn children. At the same time lacrimation of newborn children is often accompanied by further development of typical purulo-septic infection, so this symptom can be considered as prenosological forms of purulo-septic infections of newborn children

Проведено бактериологическое исследование смывов с кожи у 61 новорожденного с токсической эритемой и отделяемое конъюнктивы у 39 детей со слезотечением. Для сопоставления обследованы 110 здоровых новорожденных. По результатам динамического наблюдения проанализирована частота перехода токсической эритемы и слезотечения в типичную ГСИ. Установлено, что токсическая эритема является самостоятельным заболеванием, выполняющим по отношению к ГСИ новорожденных роль индивидуального фактора риска. В то же время слезотечение у новорожденных довольно часто сопровождается последующим развитием типичной ГСИ, а потому этот симптом может быть включен в перечень донозологических форм ГСИ новорожденных.

Keywords

НОВОРОЖДЕННЫЕ, ТОКСИЧЕСКАЯ ЭРИТЕМА, СЛЕЗОТЕЧЕНИЕ, ДОНОЗОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ФОРМЫ ГНОЙНО-СЕПТИЧЕСКИХ ИНФЕКЦИЙ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold