Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Вестник Волгоградско...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Совещание театральных деятелей 29-30 марта 1917 г. : дискуссия о судьбах русского театра в эпоху революции

Совещание театральных деятелей 29-30 марта 1917 г. : дискуссия о судьбах русского театра в эпоху революции

Abstract

The article is devoted to the understudied but important event in the history of Russian theatre in the age of revolution the conference of theatre leaders, held on March 29-30, 1917 in the Winter Palace. The study is aimed at determining the circle of participants, highlighting the discussed issues, evaluating the overall significance of the conference in the history of Russian theatre. In the process of research the author used a number of new archival materials, the most important of which are the recordings of the meeting of March 30 (found by the author in the collections of the St. Petersburg State Museum of Theatre and Music and introduced to the scientific world for the first time). On the basis of these recordings, as well as other archival materials and publicistic articles, the author managed to determine the circle of theatre leaders who participated in the conference. They include such outstanding representatives of the Russian theater as V.E. Meyerhold, M.M. Fokin, A.I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin and L.V. Sobinov. They discussed the responsibilities of self-government, elected by the actors, the rights of the theatre commissars, the pursuit of Moscow scene to achieve the maximum independence from Petrograd as well as the functions of the assistant commissar of the Provisional Government of the former Ministry of the Court. The question about the possible involvement of Soviet Workers and Soldiers in the development of theatrical reforms provoked lively debates (the proposal was not supported by the majority of the participants). The final resolution of the conference stated the demand of the "autonomy" for state theatres. The significance of the conference consists primarily in the fact that it revealed some common intentions of theatre leaders as well as contradictions on a number of issues, many of which were raised for the first time at this conference and were continually discussed throughout the revolution.

Статья посвящена малоизученному, но важному событию истории русского театра в эпоху революции совещанию театральных деятелей, состоявшемуся 29-30 марта 1917 г. в Зимнем дворце. На основании ранее не опубликованных материалов из четырех архивных и музейных собраний, а также материалов периодической печати установлен состав участников совещания и круг рассмотренных ими вопросов. В их числе были такие важные проблемы, как объем полномочий органов самоуправления, избираемых артистами, и права комиссаров отдельных театров, стремление деятелей московской казенной сцены добиться максимальной независимости от Петрограда, вопрос о возможном привлечении к разработке театральных реформ представителей Советов рабочих и солдатских депутатов. Многие темы, обозначенные участниками совещания, продолжали обсуждаться на протяжении всего периода революции.

Keywords

ИСТОРИЯ ТЕАТРА, ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЕ ТЕАТРЫ РОССИИ, РЕВОЛЮЦИЯ 1917 ГОДА, В.Э. МЕЙЕРХОЛЬД, А.И. СУМБАТОВ-ЮЖИН, Ф.А. ГОЛОВИН, V.E. MEYERHOLD, A.I. SUMBATOV-YUZHIN, F.A. GOLOVIN

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities