Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://cyberleninka....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Цели финансовой отчетности и аудита: методологические проблемы определения критериев и обоснования классификации искаженний финансовой отчетности

Цели финансовой отчетности и аудита: методологические проблемы определения критериев и обоснования классификации искаженний финансовой отчетности

Abstract

The presented article is devoted to the problems of methodological inconsistencies of the preparation and presentation of financial statements' criteria according to the concept of financial information utility, and financial statements doctrines. And in correspondence to the financial statements' audit criteria.

В статье раскрыты проблемы методологического несоответствия критериев подготовки и представления финансовой отчетности концепции полезности финансовой информации и доктринам финансовой отчетности и, в связи с этим, неопределенности критериев аудита финансовой отчетности.

Keywords

СПРАВЕДЛИВОСТЬ, ДОСТОВЕРНОСТЬ, ВЕРНОСТЬ ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЯ, УМЕСТНОСТЬ ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЯ, ИСКАЖЕНИЯ ФИНАНСОВОЙ ОТЧЕТНОСТИ, КРИТЕРИИ АУДИТА, ПОЛЕЗНОСТЬ, НАДЕЖНОСТЬ, ДОКТРИНЫ ФИНАНСОВОЙ ОТЧЕТНОСТИ, НОРМАТИВНО-ДЕСКРИПТИВНАЯ ИСТИНА

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average