Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Кубанский научный ме...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Анализ осложнений, недостатков и дефектов повторного протезирования бюгельными и съемными пластиночными протезами

Анализ осложнений, недостатков и дефектов повторного протезирования бюгельными и съемными пластиночными протезами

Abstract

В статье дана характеристика осложнений, недостатков и дефектов повторного протезирования зубов бюгельными (n=35) и съемными пластиночными (n=67) протезами. При повторном протезировании бюгельными протезами за три года наблюдения общее число осложнений составило 25,7%, недостатки выявлялись в 22,9% и дефекты в 20% случаев. При использовании съемных пластиночных протезов осложнения повторного ортопедического лечения развились в 83,6%, недостатки в 61,2% и дефекты в 71,6% случаев. Число осложнений, недостатков и дефектов повторного протезирования было выше при использовании съемных пластиночных протезов по сравнению с ортопедическим лечением бюгельными протезами. Оптимизация повторного съемного протезирования зубов связана с применением бюгельных протезов и ограничением широкого применения пластиночных протезов.

In article the characteristic of complications, drawbacks and defects repeat prosthetics using clasp (n=35) and removable laminar (n=67) prostheses. When you prosthesis clasp devices during three years of monitoring the total number amounted to 25,7% of complications, drawbacks are identified in 22,9% and 20% in defects. When using removable laminar prostheses complications of repeated orthopedic treatment developed at 83,6%, flaws and defects in 61,2% and 71,6%. The number of complications, drawbacks and defects repeat prosthetic was higher on removable laminar prostheses compared to orthopedic treatment clasp prostheses. Optimization of the regeneration of removable prosthodontic treatment involves the application of prostheses and clasp with limitation of broad application laminar prostheses.

Keywords

ПОВТОРНОЕ ПРОТЕЗИРОВАНИЕ ЗУБОВ, БЮГЕЛЬНЫЕ ПРОТЕЗЫ, СЪЕМНЫЕ ПЛАСТИНОЧНЫЕ ПРОТЕЗЫ, ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold