
Статья посвящена особенностям использования фигуры киноя (иносказание, намек) в поэзии Бедиля. Иносказание считается одной из наиболее часто употребляемых фигур в классической персидской поэзии. Однако в использовании этой фигуры ни один поэт не может сравнится с Бедилем, в творчестве которого нет бейта, где не встречалось бы иносказание. По утверждению автора статьи, именно этот факт является одной из причин смысловой труднодоступности поэзии Бедиля.
The article dwells on the peculiarities of the usage of kinoya figure (allegory, hint) in Bedil's poetry. Allegory is one of the mostly often used figures in the classical Persian poetry. However, not a single poet can be compared with Bedil as in his creation there is no one beyt without allegory. As the author asserts, this very fact accounts for meaningful difficulties of Bedil's poetry being not easily perceived.
ИНДИЙСКИЙ СТИЛЬ, БЕДИЛЬ, КИНОЯ (ИНОСКАЗАНИЕ), KINOYA (ALLEGORY), ПОЭТИЧЕСКОЕ МАСТЕРСТВО, СЛОВООБРАЗОВАНИЕ
ИНДИЙСКИЙ СТИЛЬ, БЕДИЛЬ, КИНОЯ (ИНОСКАЗАНИЕ), KINOYA (ALLEGORY), ПОЭТИЧЕСКОЕ МАСТЕРСТВО, СЛОВООБРАЗОВАНИЕ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
