Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Istoričeskaâ i Socia...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Языковая репрезентация оценки в немецкоязычной сетевой кинорецензии

Языковая репрезентация оценки в немецкоязычной сетевой кинорецензии

Abstract

The article deals with linguistic means of evaluation representation in German-language network film re-view and determines their role in the implementation of the intentional attitude of the text. Film review, be-ing a product of analytical and synthetic processing of a film text, attracts attention of the audience to cinema novelties, helps to form an opinion on the works of cinema art. The pragmatic orientation of this type of media-text is mainly determined by its evaluative component. Evaluation units are presented in all struc-tural and semantic components of film review, they are included in the summary of a film content and form a part of reasoning with its argumentation. Evaluations are the result of reevaluation as to a film in terms of its compliance with the reviewer’s own scale of values, as well as the standards generally accepted in the given sphere – a set of some or other characteristics. General evaluations qualify a film based on the totality of its properties and, as a rule, they are deduced from partial evaluations. The latter focus on the most significant aspects of a film: the work of the director and the cast of characters, setdressing for shooting. Evaluations are made actual by means of adjectives, adverbs, compound nouns, case names, as well as word-combinations and entire utterances. Evaluative predicates are characterized by intensification that is expressed in the semantics of the words and is denoted by affixes and certain lexical units. Metaphors also contribute to strengthening the evaluativity of the text.

В статье рассматриваются языковые средства репрезентации оценки в немецкоязычной сетевой кинорецензии и определяется их роль в реализации интенциональных установок текста. Кинорецензия как продукт аналитико-синтетической переработки кинотекста привлекает внимание аудитории к новинкам кино, способствует формированию мнения о произведениях кино-искусства. Прагматическая направленность этого типа медиатекста определяется главным образом его оценочной составляющей. Оценочные единицы представ-лены во всех структурно-смысловых компонентах кинорецензии, входят как в краткое изложение содержания фильма, так и являются частью рассуждения с его аргументацией. Оценки представляют собой результат осмысления киноленты с точки зрения ее соответствия собственной шкале ценностей рецензента и общепринятых в данной сфере стандартов ‒ набора тех или иных характеристик. Общие оценки квалифицируют фильм по совокупности его свойств и, как правило, выводятся из частных оценок. Последние сфокусированы на наиболее значимых аспектах киноленты: работе режиссера, актерского состава, декорациях для съемок. Оценки актуализируются посредством прилагательных, наречий, сложных существительных, прецедентных имен, а также словосочетаний и целых высказываний. Для оценочных предикатов характерна интенсификация, выраженная в семантике слов, обозначаемая аффиксами и отдельными лексемами. Усилению оценочности текста также способствуют метафоры.

Keywords

кинорецензия, оценочность, вербальные средства выражения оценки, прецедентное имя, метафора

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold