
В данной статье рассмотрены способы реализации универсальной бинарной оппозиции «свой чужой» в институциональных видах дискурсов, в частности, политическом, религиозном, массмедийном и юридическом. Выявлена и описана специфика и вариативность проявления анализируемой оппозиции в данных видах дискурсов.
The article investigates the implementation of the universal opposition “own strange” within such institutional discourses as political, religious, mass-mediated and legal. The specificity and variability of the opposition were identified and described in these kinds of discourses.
ОППОЗИЦИЯ "СВОЙ ЧУЖОЙ", "СВОЙСТВЕННОСТЬ ЧУЖДОСТЬ", ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ДИСКУРСЫ, OPPOSITION "OWN STRANGE", "SINGULARITY FOREIGNNESS"
ОППОЗИЦИЯ "СВОЙ ЧУЖОЙ", "СВОЙСТВЕННОСТЬ ЧУЖДОСТЬ", ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ДИСКУРСЫ, OPPOSITION "OWN STRANGE", "SINGULARITY FOREIGNNESS"
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
