Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

О семазиологических принципах построения и употребления медицинских терминов-эпонимов в испанском, английском и русском языках

О семазиологических принципах построения и употребления медицинских терминов-эпонимов в испанском, английском и русском языках

Abstract

The paper discusses preliminary results of a comparative onomasiological investigation related to constructing medical eponyms, which correspond to identical denotata, in Spanish, English and Russian languages. Pragmatic and social-cultural (ethic) motives of generation, extensive usage and variations of both eponyms and their acronym forms as the tools for renewal of the respective terminological systems are explained. The principle of usage (not usage) of proper names in medical terms has been revealed. A discovery of interaction between the pragmatic motivation and the social-cultural motivation is described.

В статье обсуждаются предварительные результаты сравнительного ономасиологического исследования построения медицинских терминов-эпонимов (МТЭ), обозначающих тождественные денотаты, в испанском, английском и русском языках. Объяснены прагматические и социокультурные (этические) мотивы порождения, экстенсивного использования и варьирования форм МТЭ и их акронимов как средств обновления соответствующих терминосистем. Выяснена закономерность (принцип) использования (неиспользования) имен собственных в МТЭ. Описывается открытие, свидетельствующее о взаимодействии прагматической и социокультурной мотиваций.

Keywords

ОНОМАСИОЛОГИЯ, МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ТЕРМИН-ЭПОНИМ, НОМИНАТИВНАЯ ФУНКЦИЯ, МОТИВЫ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ЭПОНИМОВ В НОМИНАЦИИ, ПРАГМАТИЧЕСКИЕ СМЫСЛЫ, СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНЫЕ СМЫСЛЫ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold