Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Сравнение ототоксичности амикацина и нетромицина при их введении неполовозрелым животным

Сравнение ототоксичности амикацина и нетромицина при их введении неполовозрелым животным

Abstract

The aim of the research was the comparative analysis of ototoxicity of amikacin and netromycin after their introduction to immature animals in therapeutic doses. As a result according to the registration of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and the record of short-latency auditory brainstem response more expressed toxic action of amikacin was revealed which was reflected in more substantial increase of thresholds of the 1 st peak and greater decrease of its amplitude in comparison with the group of the animals receiving netromycin. Introduction of amikacin and netromycin took the same damaging effect on the area of outer hair cells responsible for the perception of frequencies 2 and 4 kHz.

Цель работы сравнительный анализ ототоксичности амикацина и нетромицина при их введении неполовозрелым животным в терапевтических дозах. В результате, по данным регистрации вызванной отоакустической эмиссии на частоте продукта искажения и записи коротколатентных стволомозговых вызванных потенциалов, выявлено более выраженное токсическое действие амикацина, что отразилось в более значительном повышении порогов I пика и большем снижении его амплитуды по сравнению с группой животных, получавших нетромицин. Введение амикацина и нетромицина в одинаковой степени оказало повреждающий эффект на область наружных волосковых клеток, ответственных за восприятие на частотах 2 и 4 кГц.

Keywords

АМИКАЦИН,НЕТРОМИЦИН,НЕПОЛОВОЗРЕЛЫЕ КРОЛИКИ,ОРГАН СЛУХА,КОРОТКОЛАТЕНТНЫЕ СЛУХОВЫЕ ВЫЗВАННЫЕ ПОТЕНЦИАЛЫ,ОТОАКУСТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭМИССИЯ НА ЧАСТОТЕ ПРОДУКТА ИСКАЖЕНИЯ,AMIKACIN,NETROMYCIN,IMMATURE RABBITS,THE ORGAN OF HEARING,AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE,DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze