
The article reviews opinions of the western re-searchers on the conflict between Georgia and Abkhazia. The author considers the two ways of the conflict interpretation: when responsibility is conferred either on Russia (Georgia’s interpretation) or on Georgia (Abkhazia’s interpretation). The undertaken research allows the author to deduce, that making Russia responsible for the conflict is simultaneously the change of its scope, for the responsibility confer on Russia keeps all the complexity of relations between Georgia and Abkhazia out of sight.
Статья посвящена обзору взглядов западных исследователей на грузино-абхазский конфликт. Представлены взгляды на конфликт Грузии (ответственность лежит на России) и Абхазии (ответственность возлагается на Грузию). Проведенное исследование позволяет сделать вывод, что переложение ответственности на Россию это одновременно и изменение ее масштабов: ответственность России позволяет не замечать всю сложность отношений Грузии и Абхазии.
МЕЖЭТНИЧЕСКОЕ НАПРЯЖЕНИЕ, АБХАЗИЯ, ГРУЗИЯ, РОССИЯ, ВООРУЖЕННЫЙ КОНФЛИКТ, ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ СТОРОН
МЕЖЭТНИЧЕСКОЕ НАПРЯЖЕНИЕ, АБХАЗИЯ, ГРУЗИЯ, РОССИЯ, ВООРУЖЕННЫЙ КОНФЛИКТ, ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ СТОРОН
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
