Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Сравнительная эффективность и переносимость лерканидипина и левовращающего амлодипина у больных гипертонической болезнью в сочетании с абдоминальным ожирением

Сравнительная эффективность и переносимость лерканидипина и левовращающего амлодипина у больных гипертонической болезнью в сочетании с абдоминальным ожирением

Abstract

The aim of the work was a comparative study of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of Sisomer of amlodipine and lercanidipine in patients with essential hypertension (EH) and abdominal obesity (AO). It was shown that monotherapy with Samlodipine and lercanidipine are effective types in treating mild and moderate forms of EH, including that of associated with AO. However, treatment with lercanidipine in significantly greater number of cases leads to achievement of target blood pressure as compared to Samlodipine. Lercanidipine monotherapy resulted in a significant decrease in the level of insulin resistance and microalbuminuria in the examined patients, while the Samlodipine monotherapy did not lead to significant positive changes in these indicators. We revealed a reliable lower incidence of any adverse events in patients with EH and AO under the influence of lercanidipine monotherapy as compared with Samlodipine. Treatment with lercanidipine caused significantly lower incidence of edema of the lower limbs in patients with EH and AO than racemic amlodipine and Samlodipine.

Целью работы явилось проведение сравнительного исследования клинической эффективности и переносимости S-изомера амлодипина и лерканидипина у больных АГ в сочетании с АО. Показано, что монотерапия S-амлодипином и лерканидипином — это эффективные варианты терапии мягкой и умеренной форм ГБ, в том числе в сочетании с АО. Однако терапия лерканидипином в достоверно большем числе случаев приводит к достижению целевого АД в сравнении с S-амлодипином. Монотерапия лерканидипином приводила к достоверному снижению ИР и уровня МАУ у обследованных больных, в то время как монотерапия S-амлодипином не вызывала достоверной положительной динамики указанных показателей. Обнаружена достоверно меньшая частота развития любых побочных эффектов у больных ГБ с АО под влиянием монотерапии лерканидипином по сравнению с S-амлодипином. Лечение лерканидипином вызывало достоверно меньшую частоту развития отечности нижних конечностей у больных ГБ с АО, чем рацемический амлодипин и S-амлодипин.

Keywords

ГИПЕРТОНИЧЕСКАЯ БОЛЕЗНЬ, АБДОМИНАЛЬНОЕ ОЖИРЕНИЕ, ОТЕЧНОСТЬ НИЖНИХ КОНЕЧНОСТЕЙ, S-АМЛОДИПИН, ЛЕРКАНИДИПИН, ГіПЕРТОНіЧНА ХВОРОБА, АБДОМіНАЛЬНЕ ОЖИРіННЯ, НАБРЯКЛіСТЬ НИЖНіХ КіНЦіВОК, SАМЛОДИПіН, ЛЕРКАНіДИПіН

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold