
The article discusses the results of comparative study of traditional smears and three different liquid technologies of making ready of cytological preparations (CytoSpin3, E-Prep Processor, BD TriPath) using material from 112 patients with pathological processes of such different localizations as exudative liquids (31), soft tissues (22), lymphatic nodes (18), mammal glands (20), saliva glands (7), lungs (9), thyroid gland (5). It is established that under joint application of liquid and traditional cytology the effectiveness of cytological analysis increases up to 3.3%-5% depending on localization of pathologic nidus. The implementation of liquid technologies expands the possibilities of applying immunocitochemistry and molecular genetics to cytological materials.
Проведено сравнительное исследование традиционных мазков и трех различных жидкостных технологий приготовления цитологических препаратов (CytoSpin3, E-Prep Processor, BD TriPath) на материале, полученном от 112 больных с патологическими процессами различных локализаций выпотные жидкости (31), мягких тканей (22), лимфатических узлов (18), молочных желез (20), слюнных желез (7), легких (9), щитовидной железы (5). Установлено, что при совместном применении жидкостной и традиционной цитологии эффективность цитологического исследования повышается на 3,3-5% (в зависимости от локализации патологического очага). Использование жидкостных технологий расширяет возможности применения иммуноцитохимии и молекулярной генетики на цитологическом материале.
ЖИДКОСТНАЯ ЦИТОЛОГИЯ, ИММУНОЦИТОХИМИЧЕСКОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ
ЖИДКОСТНАЯ ЦИТОЛОГИЯ, ИММУНОЦИТОХИМИЧЕСКОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
