Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Вісник Київського на...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Методологические признаки исторических типов научной рациональности экономической теории в измерении современной философии науки

Методологические признаки исторических типов научной рациональности экономической теории в измерении современной философии науки

Abstract

The article studies the evolution of basic methodological features of economic theory on its different historical stages.The research highlights the fruitful usage of a new analytical approach on the basis of the achievements of modern philosophy of science. Its presents the research of main types of scientific rationality dominating at certain historical stages of science maturity. Such as historical, classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical types of scientific rationality. Structuring and research of basic methodological features of such historical types of economic theory's scientific rationality as classical economics (end of ХVII century 70-th of XIX century), nonclassical economics (70-th of ХІХ century -70-th of ХХ century), postnonclassical economics (70-th of ХХст. the beginning of ХХI century) are undertaken. Methodological analysis accentuated ideological, ontological, epistemological dominants and main differences in basic techniques of the main types of economic theory's scientific rationality. The research argues the illegality of existing in the economics literature attempts to identification or simplified reduction of more mature types of scientific rationality to the less mature. The article shows the contribution made by the leaders of classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical economics in the development of normative and positive economic methodology. It is emphasized a general tendency to methodological pluralism, pluralism of paradigmal structureand interdisciplinary of scientific economic knowledge throughout its historical development.

В статье исследована эволюция методологических основ экономической теории на различных исторических этапах ее развития. Обоснована продуктивность реализации для этого нового методологического подхода, состоящего в использовании достижений современной философии науки, в частности вычленения и исследования основных исторических типов научной рациональности, доминирующих на определенных исторических этапах зрелости науки. Структурированы и раскрыты основные методологические признаки таких исторических типов научной рациональности, как классическая (конец ХШ в. 70-е гг. XIX в.), неклассическая (70-е гг. ХХ в. 70-е гг. ХХ в.) и постнеклассическая (70-е гг. ХХ ст. начало ХХ1 в.) экономическая теория. На основе методологического анализа акцентированы идеологические, онтологические и гносеологические доминанты основных типов научной рациональности экономической теории, показаны различия присущих им методов и на этой основе аргументирована неправомерность встречающихся в экономической литературе попыток прямого отождествления либо упрощенной редукции более зрелых типов научной рациональности к менее зрелым. Раскрыт вклад ведущих представителей классической,неклассической и постнеклассической экономическойнауки в разработку нормативной и позитивной экономической методологии. Показана общая тенденция к усилению методологического плюрализма, пардигмальной полиструктурности и междисциплинарности научного экономического знания в ходе его исторического развития.

Keywords

ЕКОНОМіЧНА МЕТОДОЛОГіЯ,ФіЛОСОФіЯ НАУКИ,іСТОРИЧНі ТИПИ НАУКОВОї РАЦіОНАЛЬНОСТі,КЛАСИЧНА,НЕКЛАСИЧНА,ПОСТНЕКЛАСИЧНА ЕКОНОМіЧНА НАУКА,ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ,ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ,ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЕ ТИПЫ НАУЧНОЙ РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТИ,КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ,НЕКЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ,ПОСТНЕКЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА,ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY,PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE,HISTORICAL TYPES OF SCIENTIfiC RATIONALITY,CLASSICAL,NONCLASSICAL,POSTNONCLASSICAL ECONOMICS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities