
The following paper considers the debate on disciplinary boundaries of logic in German philosophy of the early 19th century. It is supposed to distinguish four competing views on understanding of the logical knowledge. The analysis of the controversy enables to adjust the location of the Hegelian idea of the "Science of Logic," project and to clarify the historical context of the emergence of formal logic as a discipline.
В статье рассматривается дискуссия о дисциплинарных границах логики в немецкой философии начала XIX в. Предлагается выделить четыре конкурирующих проекта понимания логического знания. Анализ данной полемики позволяет скорректировать представление о месте гегелевского проекта «науки логики» и прояснить исторические контексты становления формальной логики в качестве отдельной дисциплины.
ПСИХОЛОГИЗМ, ЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ВОПРОС, ФОРМАЛЬНАЯ ЛОГИКА, ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ГРАНИЦЫ
ПСИХОЛОГИЗМ, ЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ВОПРОС, ФОРМАЛЬНАЯ ЛОГИКА, ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ГРАНИЦЫ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
