Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Спор об объеме логики в Германии первой половины XIX В. : дисциплинарные границы логического знания

Спор об объеме логики в Германии первой половины XIX В. : дисциплинарные границы логического знания

Abstract

The following paper considers the debate on disciplinary boundaries of logic in German philosophy of the early 19th century. It is supposed to distinguish four competing views on understanding of the logical knowledge. The analysis of the controversy enables to adjust the location of the Hegelian idea of the "Science of Logic," project and to clarify the historical context of the emergence of formal logic as a discipline.

В статье рассматривается дискуссия о дисциплинарных границах логики в немецкой философии начала XIX в. Предлагается выделить четыре конкурирующих проекта понимания логического знания. Анализ данной полемики позволяет скорректировать представление о месте гегелевского проекта «науки логики» и прояснить исторические контексты становления формальной логики в качестве отдельной дисциплины.

Keywords

ПСИХОЛОГИЗМ, ЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ВОПРОС, ФОРМАЛЬНАЯ ЛОГИКА, ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ГРАНИЦЫ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze