
Colorectal anastomosis failure is one of the serious complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum, accounting for approximately 40 % of cases. Mortality rate in patients with colorectal anastomosis was reported to be 39 % and above 90 % in cases with anastomosis located in the abdomen. The literature analysis showed the importance of the problem of colorectal anastomosis failure, thus dictating the necessity of searching for the new methods of prevention and treatment for this serious complication. The aim of the study was to analyze the literature on the risk factors for colorectal anastomosis. The main factor influencing anastomotic leakage is the height of the anastomosis above the anal verge. The authors’ data were often contradictory.
Одним из грозных осложнений после внутрибрюшной резекции прямой кишки является несостоятельность швов колоректального анастомоза, частота которой достигает до 40 %. Летальность при несостоятельности швов колоректального анастомоза может достигать до 39 %, а при расположении анастомоза в брюшной полости более 90 %. В обзоре литературы показана актуальность проблемы несостоятельности швов колоректального анастомоза. Необходимы новые методы профилактики и лечения данного осложнения. Практически во всех исследованиях высота расположения опухоли и анастомоза от ануса является фактором риска развития несостоятельности швов колоректального анастомоза. По остальным факторам однозначного вывода нет.
НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ШВОВ,КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНЫЙ АНАСТОМОЗ,ФАКТОРЫ РИСКА,ДРЕНИРОВАНИЕ,ANASTOMOTIC LEAK,COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS,RISK FACTORS,DRAINAGE
НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ШВОВ,КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНЫЙ АНАСТОМОЗ,ФАКТОРЫ РИСКА,ДРЕНИРОВАНИЕ,ANASTOMOTIC LEAK,COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS,RISK FACTORS,DRAINAGE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
