Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://cyberleninka....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Природа человека в отечественной религиозно-философской мысли конца XVI - начала XVIII В.

Природа человека в отечественной религиозно-философской мысли конца XVI - начала XVIII В.

Abstract

The article deals with various religious-philosophical writings by Ivan IV Terrible, starets Artemiy, Maximus of the Greek, Athanasiy of Kholmogory, Feofan Prokopovitch, D. I. Fonvizin, А. Т. Bolotov. The author considers the problem of human being in Russian religious-philosophical traditions and concludes that medieval anthropological representations exerted a profound influence on the Russian 18th century culture.

В статье рассматриваются религиозно-философские сочинения Ивана IV Грозного, старца Артемия, Максима Грека, Афанасия Холмогорского, Феофана Прокоповича, Д. И. Фонвизина, А. Т. Болотова. Автор анализирует проблему человека в русской религиозно-философской традиции и приходит к заключению, что возникшие в древнерусской традиции антропологические представления оказали большое влияние на русскую культуру XVIII в.

Keywords

ФИЛОСОФСКАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ, РЕЛИГИОЗНАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ЭТИКА

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average