Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Константин Великий и Петр i: стратегии государственно-конфессиональной политики

Константин Великий и Петр i: стратегии государственно-конфессиональной политики

Abstract

Constantine the Great and Peter I are compared in the article in terms of their relationship to the Christian Church. The comparison of these rulers was an important element of the mythologizing of Russian history. As a result, the acts of Peter shade all pre-Petrine Russia's past (just as acts of Constantine distinctly shared by Christian Rome from the pagan Rome). Constantine was the protector of Christianity, while Peter strongly limited the rights and influence of the Church. However, in their religious policy is an important thing in common. Both emperors converted the church into an element of the state machine, and church leaders in state figures. They both sought to maximize the mobilization and unification of social life.

Константин Великий и Петр I сопоставляются в статье с точки зрения их отношения к христианской Церкви. Сравнение этих правителей было важным элементом мифологизации истории России. Устремленные в будущее деяния Петра I затеняют все допетровское прошлое. Несмотря на то, что Константин был покровителем христианства, Петр же решительно ограничил права и сферу влияния Церкви, в их религиозной политике имеется важная общая черта. Оба государя превращали Церковь в элемент государственной машины, а церковных служителей в государственных деятелей. Они оба стремились к максимальной мобилизации и унификации общественной жизни.

Keywords

АНТИЧНОЕ РЕЛИГИОЗНОЕ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО,ИСТОРИЯ РОССИИ,ИСТООИЯ ХРИСТИАНСТВА,ПЕТР I,КОНСТАНТИН ВЕЛИКИЙ,ANCIENT RELIGIOUS LEGISLATION,HISTORY OF RUSSIA,HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY,PETER I,CONSTANTINE THE GREAT

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold