Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Rusinarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Категория абстрактности имен существительных в русском и болгарском языках: когнитивные рефлексы формализации

Категория абстрактности имен существительных в русском и болгарском языках: когнитивные рефлексы формализации

Abstract

The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the perception of words in the Russian and Bulgarian languages. The analysed words were opposed by the grammatical category of abstractedness. The leading method of research was the psycholinguistic behavioral experiments. The authors prove the thesis that the grammatical category of abstractedness in the Bulgarian language has a higher degree of formalisation compared with that in the Russian language, which influences the interpretation of words during the bimodal (audio-visual) perception: the rate of processing stimuli in Bulgarian is higher than in Russian. The results of the experiment led to the conclusion that there are differences in the pattern of cognitive processing of word meanings, characterised by different types of formalisation of semantic differences. These results are consistent with the theory about the influence of the information type on the cognitive processing of the sign in the multimodal perception, even in the circumstances when this information is out of the focus of voluntary attention. The findings are important for understanding the cognitive consequences of varying the ways of formal marking of the semantically similar categories in cognate languages.

В статье представлены результаты проведенного сравнительного анализа восприятия лексем русского и болгарского языков, противопоставленных по признаку конкретности-абстрактности, в ситуации психолингвистических поведенческих экспериментов. Доказывается тезис о том, что сравнительно большая степень формализации категории абстрактности в болгарском языке в сравнении с русским языком оказывает влияние на интерпретацию лексем в ситуации бимодального (аудиальновизуального) восприятия, что проявляется в значимом различии скорости обработки стимулов. Результаты проведенного эксперимента позволили сделать вывод о различиях в схеме когнитивной обработки значений слов, характеризующихся разными типами формализации семантических различий. Полученные результаты согласуются с теорией влияния типа информации на когнитивную обработку знака при полимодальном восприятии, даже в условиях, когда эта информация не находится в фокусе произвольного внимания. Результаты исследования значимы для осознания когнитивных следствий варьирования способов формального маркирования семантически подобных категорий в близкородственных языках.

Keywords

русский язык, болгарский язык, категория абстрактности, психолингвистический эксперимент, поведенческий эксперимент, бимодальное восприятие

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold