
В статье рассматриваются общенаучные и теоретико-правовые методологические проблемы изучения такого деструктивного с точки зрения юриспруденции социального явления, как маргинальность. Анализируются разнообразные средства познания и способы организации познавательной деятельности в общеправовой теории маргинальности.The article deals with general scientific as well as theoretical and legal methodological problems in studying marginality as a destructive social phenomenon from jurisprudence's point of view. We explore various cognitive means and the ways of cognitive process organization in the general legal theory of marginality.
ОБЩЕПРАВОВАЯ ТЕОРИЯ МАРГИНАЛЬНОСТИ, МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАЛЬНАЯ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ, СИНТЕЗ, СИСТЕМА, ПРИНЦИП МНОЖЕСТВЕННОСТИ ЗНАНИЙ, СИНЕРГЕТИКА, ГЕШТАЛЬТ
ОБЩЕПРАВОВАЯ ТЕОРИЯ МАРГИНАЛЬНОСТИ, МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ, ИНТЕГРАЛЬНАЯ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ, СИНТЕЗ, СИСТЕМА, ПРИНЦИП МНОЖЕСТВЕННОСТИ ЗНАНИЙ, СИНЕРГЕТИКА, ГЕШТАЛЬТ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
