Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://cyberleninka....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Сравнительный анализ дистанционной литотрипсии и перкутанной нефролитотомии почечных камней размерами от 1 до 2 сантиметров

Сравнительный анализ дистанционной литотрипсии и перкутанной нефролитотомии почечных камней размерами от 1 до 2 сантиметров

Abstract

Литературный анализ результатов лечения камней почек показал успешность применения дистанционной литотрипсии (ДЛТ) в качестве монотерапии почечных конкрементов до 10 мм. Наиболее эффективным методом элиминации конкрементов > 20 мм является перкутанная нефролитотомия. Дискутабельным остается вопрос выбора метода лечения камней размером 1 – 2 см. Нами изучены результаты лечения 50 больных с конкрементами от 10 до 20 мм. 26 пациентам выполнена перкутанная нефролитотомия (1-я группа), 24 больным проведена ДЛТ (2-я группа). В 25% случаев пациентам 2-й группы требовалось выполнение 2-х сеансов ДЛТ, а в 8,3% 3-х. При этом ни один пациент 1-й группы не нуждался в повторной нефроскопии. Анализ послеоперационных осложнений показал, что продолжительность макрогематурии, активация мочевой инфекции, мигрирующие и резидуальные конкременты имелись чаще (p

Literature analysis of the results of renal calculi treatment showed that ESWL was successful used as monotherapy of kidney stones 20 mm. Debating point still remains the choice of treatment of stones the size ranging 1 2 cm. We have studied the results of treatment of 50 patients with10 20 mm stones. 26 patients (gr. I) were performed PNL, in 24 patients (gr. II) ESWL was used. 25% of I group patients required2 ESWL sessions, 8.3% 3. No patient of gr.I needed to be re-PNL. The analysis of postoperative complications showed that macrohematuria, urinary infections, migrating and residual calculi were more frequent in patients of gr. (p

Keywords

ПЕРКУТАННАЯ НЕФРОЛИТОТОМИЯ, ДИСТАНЦИОННАЯ ЛИТОТРИПСИЯ, КАМНИ ПОЧЕК

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities