
The article covers the specifics of the natural scientific approach of “characterological creatology” in social knowledge, in comparison with the two leading paradigms — the biological movement in sociology (by the example of social organicism) and the modern “cultural paradigm” suggested by some American authors.
В статье рассмотрена специфика естественно-научного подхода «характерологической креатологии» в социальном знании в сравнении с двумя ведущими парадигмами — биологическим направлением в социологии (на примере социального органицизма) и современной «культурной парадигмой» американских авторов.
СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ НАУКИ, ЕСТЕСТВЕННО-НАУЧНЫЙ ПОДХОД, ХАРАКТЕРОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ КРЕАТОЛОГИЯ, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЙ ОРГАНИЦИЗМ, КУЛЬТУРНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА
СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ НАУКИ, ЕСТЕСТВЕННО-НАУЧНЫЙ ПОДХОД, ХАРАКТЕРОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ КРЕАТОЛОГИЯ, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЙ ОРГАНИЦИЗМ, КУЛЬТУРНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
