Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Особенности измерения внутриглазного давления у детей

Особенности измерения внутриглазного давления у детей

Abstract

This review discusses the results of various studies conducted in recent years on the comparison of modern methods of measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in children: pneumotonometry, Maklakov applanation tonometry, and tonometry using Perkins tonometer, Goldmann tonometer, Icare tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, TonoPen handheld tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer TIOP01, or a dynamic contour Pascal tonometer. This study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of measurement of IOP in children, including the evaluation of patients with fibrous lens capsules that might affect the measurement of IOP and an analysis of the characteristics of evaluation of IOP in children with congenital glaucoma.

В обзоре приводится анализ различных исследований последних лет, касающихся сравнения современных методов оценки внутриглазного давления у детей: бесконтактной пневмотонометрии, тонометрии по Маклакову, тонометрии с помощью тонометров Перкинса, Гольдмана, Icare, Ocular Response Analyzer, Tono-Pen, транспальпебрального тонометра ТВГД-01, динамического контурного тонометра Паскаля. Обсуждаются преимущества и недостатки существующих способов офтальмотонометрии у детей, оцениваются факторы, которые могут оказывать влияние на результат измерения внутриглазного давления. Анализируются особенности оценки офтальмотонуса у пациентов с врождённой глаукомой.

Keywords

ВНУТРИГЛАЗНОЕ ДАВЛЕНИЕ У ДЕТЕЙ,ВРОЖДЁННАЯ ГЛАУКОМА,ЦЕНТРАЛЬНАЯ ТОЛЩИНА РОГОВИЦЫ У ДЕТЕЙ,ОФТАЛЬМОТОНОМЕТРИЯ У ДЕТЕЙ,INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT,CHILDREN,CONGENITAL GLAUCOMA,CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS IN CHILDREN

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold