Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://cyberleninka....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Научная юридическая терминология в официальном и неофициальном толкованиях права

Научная юридическая терминология в официальном и неофициальном толкованиях права

Abstract

The paper deals with the regularities of scientific interpretation of legal terms. To realize this purpose, we compared the scientific definitions of the two legal terms: “presumption of innocence” and “authentic interpretation of the law”. On the one hand, scientific studies, reflect the searching, epistemological content associated with the informal interpretation of law, and, on the other hand, dictionaries reflect the normative content associated with the formal interpretation of law. The paper shows that the terms in research papers and monographs operate according to the laws of scientific communication, among which due to the impact of the inevitable scientific pluralism. Scientific interpretation of the phenomena designated by such terms as “presumption of innocence” and “authentic interpretation of the law” in the dictionary comes from the foundations, giving impetus to centripetal tendencies, and in the monographs to centrifugal ones. In the field of scientific interpretation of the phenomena there is an outstanding resistant part having a tendency to become normative.

В статье исследуются закономерности научного толкования юридических терминов. Для осуществления данной цели было проведено сопоставление научных определений двух юридических терминов: «презумпция невиновности» и «аутентичное толкование права», с одной стороны, в научных работах, отражающих поисковое, гносеологическое содержание, соотносимое с неофициальным толкованием права, и с другой стороны, в словарях, отражающих нормативное содержание, соотносимое с официальным толкованием права. В статье показано, что термины в статьях и монографиях функционируют по законам научной коммуникации, в том числе и вследствие воздействия неизбежного для нее научного плюрализма. Научная интерпретация явлений, обозначенных терминами «презумпция невиновности» и «аутентичное толкование права», в словарях исходит из оснований, дающих толчок центростремительным тенденциям, а в монографиях центробежным. В поле научной интерпретации явлений выделятся устойчивая часть, имеющая тенденцию становиться нормативной.

Keywords

НАУЧНАЯ ТЕРМИНОЛОГИЯ, ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕРМИНОЛОГИЯ, ДОКТРИНАЛЬНОЕ (НАУЧНОЕ) ТОЛКОВАНИЕ ПРАВА, ОФИЦИАЛЬНОЕ ТОЛКОВАНИЕ ПРАВА, НЕОФИЦИАЛЬНОЕ ТОЛКОВАНИЕ ПРАВА, DOCTRINAL (SCIENTIFIC) INTERPRETATION OF LAW

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average