Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Влияние смены метаметодологических концепций на эволюцию экономической теории

Влияние смены метаметодологических концепций на эволюцию экономической теории

Abstract

The active role of methodology in the developing the reliable economic knowledge during the period of a crisis of the economic theory is defined by authors; dependence of the conceptual framework of theoretical economic concepts on the levels of methodological knowledge (all-philosophical, general scientific, specific scientific) is shown; it is offered to consider the evolution of Economic theories from a position of consecutive change and continuity of meta-methodological concepts in Economic Science (Essential, Functional, System, Synergistically oriented); polyparadigms of the local Economic Science is recognized; the problem of elaboration of new meta-methodological approach to creation of the Economic theory with the powerful predictive performance which is capable to give answers to global challenges of the present is proved.

Определена активная роль методологии в процессе выработки достоверного экономического знания в период кризисного состояния экономической теории; показана зависимость понятийного аппарата теоретических экономических концепций от уровней методологического знания (общефилософского, общенаучного, частнонаучного); предложено рассматривать эволюцию экономических теорий с позиции последовательной смены и преемственности метаметодологических концепций в экономической науке (сущностной, функциональной, системной, синергетически ориентированной); диагностировано состояние полипарадигмальности отечественной экономической науки; обоснована задача выработки нового метаметодологического подхода к созданию экономической теории с мощным прогностическим аппаратом, способным дать ответы на глобальные вызовы современности.

Keywords

МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ЗНАНИЕ, ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ, УРОВНИ МЕТОДОЛОГИИ, МЕТАМЕТОДОЛОГИЯ, ОБЩЕНАУЧНЫЕ МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ КОНЦЕПЦИИ, СТРУКТУРА МЕТОДА, ЧАСТНЫЕ ПАРАДИГМЫ, ГЛОБАЛЬНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА, ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕОРИИ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold