Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Novosibirsk State Pe...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Лексикографическое портретирование служебных слов (на примере частицы-союза только)

Лексикографическое портретирование служебных слов (на примере частицы-союза только)

Abstract

The article analyzes lexicographical interpretation of the conjunction brace только in dictionaries of different types, and describes the rationale to submit such information on this linguistic unit that would reflect modern usage of the particle-conjunction только in oral and written speech. The purpose of the article is by the example of the particle-conjunction только to attempt to represent a lexicographical "portrait" of the functional word. It is noted that the information about the functional word, which the reader of lexicographic editions has at the disposal, is either distributed among various dictionaries, or do not fully reflect the current state of the language, therefore, it causes some difficulties and inconveniences for the reader. The article also raises important questions of the description of the lexical meaning of the particle-conjunction, representation of the semantic structure of the polysemantic functional unit, which is referred to the problem of polysemy and homonymy differentiation. It emphasizes that lexicographic description of each functional word should consider several parameters and include a number of areas reflected in the dictionary entry describing the particle-conjunction within the integrative approach. The article describes those areas and parameters of a dictionary entry which determines a functional word in accordance with the integrative approach and the current state of Russian Studies.

В статье анализируются лексикографические интерпретации частицы-союза только в словарях разных типов, обосновывается необходимость предъявления такой информации о данной языковой единице, которая бы отражала современное ее употребление в устной и письменной речи. Цель статьи на примере частицы-союза только попытаться представить лексикографический «портрет» служебного слова. Отмечается, что в распоряжении читателя лексикографических изданий находится разнообразная информация о слове, однако эта информация либо рассеяна по различным словарям, либо не в полной мере отражает современное состояние языка, что создает определенные трудности и неудобства для читателя. В статье также поднимаются важные вопросы описания лексического значения частицы-союза, представления семантической структуры многозначной служебной единицы, что связано и с проблемой разграничения полисемии и омонимии. Подчеркивается, что лексикографическое описание каждого служебного слова должно быть полипараметральным и включать ряд зон, которые должны быть отражены в словарной статье, описывающей частицу-союз в рамках интегративного подхода. В заключение делаются выводы о тех зонах и параметрах, которые необходимы в словарной статье, описывающей служебное слово в соответствии с интегральным подходом и современным состоянием русистики.

Keywords

ЛЕКСИКОГРАФИЯ, ЛЕКСИКОГРАФИЧЕСКОЕ ПОРТРЕТИРОВАНИЕ, СЛУЖЕБНОЕ СЛОВО, ЧАСТИЦА-СОЮЗ, СЛОВАРНАЯ СТАТЬЯ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities