Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback

Особенности вербализации модальной семантики возможности в готском, ДревнеИ средневерхненемецком языках

Особенности вербализации модальной семантики возможности в готском, ДревнеИ средневерхненемецком языках

Abstract

С позиций диахронического подхода рассматривается развитие в немецком языке модальной семантики возможности. На материале текстов письменных памятников готского, древнеи средневерхненемецкого языков проводится сопоставительный анализ становления модальных глаголов, выражающих различные оттенки модальности потенциальности, с учетом их текстовой частотности в анализируемые периоды истории немецкого языка. На основе данного анализа было показано, как в процессе декатегоризации перехода функций выражения модальности возможности от наклонений к находящимся в процессе становления модальным глаголам категориальные значения, объективированные первоначально в морфологической категории на грамматическом уровне, переходят к лексическим средствам, позволяющим вербализировать потенциальную модальность более дифференцированно.

This article is written in the diachronic approach and is devoted to the development of modal semantics of possibility. The comparative analysis of formation of the modal verbs expressing various shades of modality of potentiality is based on Gothic, Old and Middle High German texts. On the basis of this analysis and the use of statistical methods of research the process of decategorization transition of the functions of expression of possibility from morphological category, i. e. moods, to lexical-grammatical means, i. e. preterite-present verbs was shown. The use of the lexical-grammatical means allows to express the potential internal modality more differentially.

Keywords

МОДАЛЬНОСТЬ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ, ГОТСКИЙ, ДРЕВНЕИ СРЕДНЕВЕРХНЕНЕМЕЦКИЙ, ОПТАТИВ, ДЕКАТЕГОРИЗАЦИЯ, ГЛАГОЛЫ KöNNEN, DüRFEN, THE VERBS KöNNEN AND DüRFEN

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold